The Medical Board opined that 14 days charter of duty shows no contributory factor to the cause of ID and No close time association of ID with stress and strain of service. Hence, ID conceded as "Neither Attributable to Nor Aggravated by Military Service".
We are here to protect any
Kind of Violance
We are here to protect any
Kind of Violance
We are here to protect any
Kind of Violance
We are here to protect any
Kind of Violance
We are here to protect any
Kind of Violance
We are here to protect any
Kind of Violance
We are here to protect any
Kind of Violance
We are here to protect any
Kind of Violance
About Us
We are here to fight against any violance with experience
Kanoonwala – Legal Services (KLS), is a legal consultancy firm comprising of young lawyers and working since the year 2009. The idea of establishing a legal consultancy firm was proposed by our colleague, in the year 2016, who has actively participated since the year 2009. However, the firm has got its legal recognition by the name and style of M/s Kanoonwala – Legal Services, in the year 2017 having its registration no. UPSA28713952/2017.
More than 13 years
professional experience
The firm has more than 50 lawyers practicing in different Courts of our country including some of the High Courts and they are dedicated to their services of the highest standard. The firm is now dealing in different filed of law such as Armed Forces Law (Defense services), civil, corporate and commercial law, litigation, arbitration, banking and financial services, Taxation, Labour and Employment matters, intellectual property laws, family court matters, and consumer disputes and service laws, etc. and continuously widening its rage as per the need of its existing clients, moreover, on the specific requests of satisfied clients. The core concept of KLS is to give the best of possible and available services to all, who approach us, without any discrimination. We as a team also strive to help the weaker section of our society so that no one can be deprived of getting justice in the absence of money.
Services
We are here to fight against any violance with experience
GENERAL LITIGATION
Litigation is a cornerstone of the group’s practice. Our lawyers have vast experience in defending our clients’ interests in the Civil Courts, High Court at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench and Nainital, Supreme Court, as well as various judicial and quasi-judicial bodies.
CONSUMER DISPUTES
India is the second-largest country by population and therefore there is a huge number of consumers and all global brands focusing their business on the Indian Market. Now a day’s Indian FMCG Sector is the fastest growing sector in the Indian economy after the service sector.
INSURANCE LAW
Due to the dynamic change in the Indian economic situation, the insurance sector in India had been growing in the fastest growing industry inviting the attention of several International Companies.
REAL - ESTATE
The ratio of the real estate sector in our GDP is increasing year to year and there is a huge opportunity for development in this field. To regulate and to bring uniformity to this field all over India our parliament had enacted many Acts and also many provisions had been made in this regard.
SERVICE & EMPLOYMENT MATTER
The sector of Service laws and employment matter is a growing sector in which the employee of the central government, state government, and other organizations are facing the serious concern of attrition with regard to their employment.
INDUSTRY AND LABOUR
To regulate the relationship and behavior of employer and employee/workman and to establish a peaceful environment for industrial growth various labour laws have been enacted by our parliament.
Latest News
Dear CLAT aspirant student as per the notification issued by
As per the judgement of scdrc lucknow as well as apex court in case of K.A. Nagagami vs Karanataka housing board @18 % interest rewarded by the SC of India in year 2016 , Scdrc Lucknow com case no---112/2018 In dr shipra kak vs sahara prime city decide in the favor of complainant.
Also as per the IRDA circular insurance company can not repudiate the claim on delay intimation. delay intimation theft FIR
We have gone through the record of inquiry with the assistance of learned counsel and, in our considered view, the finding which has been recorded by the inquiry officer in reference to charge nos. 1,2 and 3 is duly supported with the material on record and after revisiting the record of inquiry, has been confirmed by the disciplinary/appellate authority.
In a recent judgment, Supreme Court has explained the necessity of voluntariness and animus in executing the gift deed. As per the judgment, there are several circumstances and supporting facts that need to be relied on by the trial court and first appellate court and in the absence of these facts and circumstances the gift deed was held to be an invalid and spurious document.
Allahabad High Court has extended the period of interim orders or directions passed by either High Court or any court subordinate to Hon'ble High Court in the State of Uttar Pradesh
On a plain reading of sub-section (3) of Section 401 Cr.P.C., it has to be held that sub-section (3) of Section 401 Cr.P.C. prohibits/bars the High Court to convert a finding of acquittal into one of conviction. Though and as observed herein above, the High Court has revisional power to examine whether there is manifest error of law or procedure etc., however, after giving its own findings on the findings recorded by the court acquitting the accused and after setting aside the order of acquittal, the High Court has to remit the matter to the trial Court and/or the first appellate Court, as the case may be. As observed by this Court in the case of K. Chinnaswamy Reddy (supra), if the order of acquittal has been passed by the trial Court, the High Court may remit the matter to the trial Court and even direct retrial. However, if the order of acquittal is passed by the first appellate court, in that case, the High Court has two options available, (i) to remit the matter to the first appellate Court to rehear the appeal; or (ii) in an appropriate case remit the matter to the trial Court for retrial and in such a situation the procedure as mentioned in paragraph 11 of the decision in K. Chinnaswamy Reddy (supra), referred to herein above, can be followed. Therefore, in the present case, the High Court has erred in quashing and setting aside the order of acquittal and reversing and/or converting a finding of acquittal into one of conviction and consequently convicted the accused, while exercising the powers under Section 401 Cr.P.C. The order of conviction by the High Court, while exercising the revisional jurisdiction under Section 401 Cr.P.C., is therefore unsustainable, beyond the scope and ambit of Section 401 Cr.P.C., more particularly sub-section (3) of Section 401 Cr.P.C. Issue no.1 is answered accordingly.